Police issue appeal after Melbourne woman loses over $8000 in tax scam
Victoria Police are appealing for the public's help in identifying a suspect after a Melbourne woman lost more than $8000 in a telephone scam.
| Ratings 1× | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard level: | 50 % | ||
| Number of ratings: | 1× | Latest rating: | Jun 12, 2016 |
| Views | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of views: | 28× | Last viewed: | Jun 22, 2024 |
More comments on this number can be found at our partner site: https://www.number-lookup.co.uk/number/07923358111 1×
More comments on this number can be found at our partner site: https://www.reverse-lookup.co.uk/number/07923358111 1×
The phone number database and ratings are created by the users themselves. They can add their reviews either through the website or through the Call Insider app.
Comments are posted by the users of the website anonymously, so it is not possible to ensure their 100% trustworthiness. We, of course, get requests to remove comments on phone numbers stating that they are a tool of competition and they have been fabricated. We, therefore, reserve the right to delete comments or even disable comments for a particular number.
Every user can deactivate any comment until the moderators deal with it. Just click the bin icon in the bottom right corner, fill in a short form and confirm the email address where a statement on how the moderators dealt with the comment will be sent. The processing of such a request usually takes 1-2 weeks.
FAQVictoria Police are appealing for the public's help in identifying a suspect after a Melbourne woman lost more than $8000 in a telephone scam.
It can be a very convincing trick… “You can check the number in your display online sir. You’ll see I’m really calling from your bank.” That is, of course, if you are unaware that phone numbers can be spoofed. Then again, they wouldn’t be successful scammers if they weren’t convincing. If you suggest calling them…
Sent random text message about apple cloud account suspend and just verify information on http://bit.ly/1VTpvRG. Obviously I did not verify.